Comments on: ആളു നോക്കി മാറുന്ന യോജന

by: The Hidden facts

Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:38:23 +0000

The Christian church during British occupation of India, tried to re-write Hindu scriptures and ancient Indian History. British government in 1847 employed one Max Mueller on salary basis for this job. He was asked to translate the Vedas sacred to the Hindus in the most demeaning way so that Hindus will loose faith in their own scriptures. This effort by Christians can be seen in the present generation of secularists who were fed with false theories of Aryan invasions, caste systems and the like. Not only that some seven Max Mueller Bhavans was built in India to cheat the public with this false translations created by the paid employee of the Christians during the British period. This nefarious background is revealed after going through the British documents in London.

In a letter to Chevalier Bunsen, Max Mueller writes, “India is much riper for Christianity than Rome or Greece were at the time of St. Paul” and “I should like to live for ten years quietly, learn the language, try to make friends, and then see whether I was fit to take part in a work, by means of which the old mischief of Indian priest craft can be overthrown and the way opened for the entrance of simple Christian teaching.” Max Mueller fulfills his contract to the British when he writes, “No one would have supposed that at so early a period, and in so primitive a state of society, there could have risen a literature (the Vedas) which for pedantry and downright absurdity can hardly be matched anywhere… These works (the Vedas) deserve to be studied as the physician studies the twaddles of idiots, and the ravings of madmen.”

But for the secularists who were educated by the English medium Christian schools Max Mueller is a great guy. This is enormous deception by the Christians. The deviousness of the church and Christianity is unmatched in the history of the world. Origin of Christmas can be summarized as follows. December Solstice Winter arrives in the northern hemisphere tonight, as the Sun reaches its southernmost point in the sky. The change is called the winter solstice, which occurs after midnight from the Mountain time zone eastward, but BEFORE midnight in the west. Because the solstice is the shortest day of the year, it’s been important to many cultures. They’ve timed celebrations and sacrifices to coincide with the solstice often in an effort to entice the Sun to head northward again and bring longer, warmer days. One of the most famous celebrations was Saturnalia, which honored the Roman god of agriculture. It began as a one-day event, but over time expanded to cover seven days. It celebrated the end of the harvest and vintage. The celebration of Christmas might have evolved from the Saturnalia, as the early Christian church tried to convert the masses from their earlier customs. Most theologians agree that Christ was not born in December. But co-opting the Saturnalia might have been a good way to ease people into a new set of beliefs. No one can say for sure, but the solstice might have played a role in a change to the calendar in 46 B.C. Until then, the western year began in March. But
Julius Caesar decreed that the year would start on January 1st. Even so, much of the western world
didn’t adopt the change for many centuries. England and its American colonies made the change in 1752.

by: The Hidden facts

Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:36:29 +0000

Sancha Dwipa could be an Egyptian island. However, there is a small Mexican island town just off the Pacific coast in Nayarit state, Mexcaltitan, where the preconquest citizens built their homes out of seashells. According to Toltec mythology, Mexcaltitan was the Mexican deity Quetzalcoatl’s port of entry into Mexico. In Hindu mythology, Nahusha and God Vishnu are in close association. Vishnu is often pictured as floating on a raft of snakes. He also holds a conch hand in his hand. The Mexican deity Quetzalcoatl was also pictured as floating on a raft of snakes. Conch shells adorned his temples. Quetzalcoatl also wears a necklace of conch shells. But the Mexican anomalies don’t stop here. The pre-Aztec Toltecs were also called Nahoa and Nahua. Nahua tribes did, and still do, extend even into South America. Since the Toltecs could not pronounce “V,” the words Nahoa and Nahua derive from the Sanskrit Nava, meaning “Ship; Boat.” The word “Toltec” also appears to derive from the Sanskrit word for “Descendant of the Upper World Nation”: Tal-Toka. Quetzalcoatl’s original homeland was Tlapallan. This could derive from the Sanskrit Tala-Pala (The Upper World Land of Pala which is another name of the Indian state of Bihar. Even the stories of the lives of Dyaus-Nahusha and Quetzalcoatl are similar. Dyaus-Nahusha was banished from India for getting drunk and raping the wife of the legendary Hindu philosopher Agastya. Quetzalcoatl was banished getting drunk and raping his own daughter. Nahusha and Quetzalcoatl were the same individual. It’s easy to prove that India once colonized Mexico. The Bible was written by Hindu intellectuals for the benefit of the working class and what is written in Vedas and Puranas are the evidence for it.
The name Italy in Sanskrit Etaly signifies a country situated at the bottom of the continent (now called Europe). Many Roman gods originated from the east (Vedic deities), especially from the Greece e.g. Zeus is Dyus, Jupiter is Diupeter (or Dyua Pitar, the Vedic Indra), Minerva is Pallas Athen, Diana is Artemia, Venus (the Vedic Lakshmi) became Aphrodite, Neptune is Poseidon, Vulcan is Hephaestus, and so on. Even today we can see the image of Lord Shiva standing over a public fountain in the square at Bolgona, Italy with his Trident and hoods of two snakes on his shoulders. Throughout Italy images of Ganesha, Shiva and other Vedic Deities can be found in excavations. They also worshipped Lord Rama and images if Rama, Sita and Lakshman can be found in walls of ancient houses being excavated. Even portraits of Pompey, the Consul of Rome wearing the distinct mark of a V “Tilok” on his forehead is found. A Painting of Etruscan emperor (2nd Cent. B.C.) Wearing the same “Tilok” on his forehead and neck and wearing a “Dhoti” can be seen. The City of ROME is pronounced as “ROMA” in Italy, is also named after LORD RAMA. “O” replaces the Sanskrit letter “A” for European pronunciation, just as Nasa in Sanskrit is spelled as “Nose” in English. This indicates the entire Roman Empire was part of Lord Rama Empire. Additional proof of this can be found from the founding date of Italy, which was 21st April in 753 B.C., which is unique because no other ancient city is so very exact about its founding date. The reason why this exact date is recorded is because 21st April is the date of Ramnavami in 753 B.C. Yet another proof is that another Italian city, Ravenna is named after Lord Rams adversary Ravana, and as Ravana was the enemy of Lord Ram, the city of Rome and Ravenna is situated diametrically opposite each other, one on the western coast and the other on the eastern coast.
Pope comes from the Sanskrit word Paap meaning sin and ha meaning removes, thus Paap-ha means remover of sin. So Paap-ha was the title and the function of the supreme pontiff attached to the Vedic administration. And from this came the shortened word Pope. Every sage lives in a Hermitage which is called “Vatika”, even the Vedic sage Paap-ha lived in his Vatika which is still now called “Vatican”. Further evidence that the Vatican was once as Vedic post is found in the Vatican’s Etruscan Museum. Therein is preserved and on display five Vedic Shiva-lingas, some of which the Vedic Pope used to worship, as well as images of Shiva with a Cobra raising its hood over Shiva’s head. Many others are said to be hidden in the museum and in the cellars of the Vatican. Much of the present day rituals of the Pope have roots in the Vedic tradition, like chanting of Hymns, the purification with incense, the offering and distribution of Food and even washing of feet are the remnants of full Vedic rituals that used to be practiced by the Vedic Pope. Washing of feet is not a normal Christian practice because congregation members always wear socks and shoes.
Jesus physically never existed and all claims of Jesus derive from hearsay accounts. No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling, works of carpentry, or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus. Devastating to historians, there occurs not a single contemporary writing that mentions Jesus. All documents about Jesus got written well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus, or from fraudulent, mythical or allegorical writings. Hearsay means information derived from other people rather than on a witness’ own knowledge. Hearsay provides no proof or good evidence, and therefore, we should dismiss it. We know from history about witchcraft trials and kangaroo courts that hearsay provides neither reliable nor fair statements of evidence. We know that mythology can arise out of no good information whatsoever. We live in a world where many people believe in demons, UFOs, ghosts, or monsters, and an innumerable number of fantasies believed as fact taken from nothing but belief and hearsay. The same reasoning must go against the claims of a historical Jesus or any other historical person. The most “authoritative” accounts of a historical Jesus come from the four canonical Gospels of the Bible. Note that these Gospels did not come into the Bible as original and authoritative from the authors themselves, but rather from the influence of early church fathers, especially the most influential of them all: Irenaeus of Lyon who lived in the middle of the second century. Many heretical gospels got written by that time, but Irenaeus considered only some of them for mystical reasons. The four gospels then became Church cannon for the orthodox faith. Most of the other claimed gospel writings were burned, destroyed, or lost. Although the gospels of the New Testament– like those discovered at Nag Hammadi– are attributed to Jesus’ followers, no one knows who actually wrote any of them. Not only do we not know who wrote them, consider that none of the Gospels got written during the alleged life of Jesus, nor do the unknown authors make the claim to have met an earthly Jesus. Add to this that none of the original gospel manuscripts exist; we only have copies of copies. The consensus of many biblical historians put the dating of the earliest Gospel, that of Mark, at sometime after 70 C.E., and the last Gospel, John after 90 C.E. This would make it some 40 years after the alleged crucifixion of Jesus that we have any Gospel writings that mention him. The first Christian gospel was probably written during the last year of the war, or the year it ended. Where it was written and by whom we do not know; the work is anonymous, although tradition attributes it to Mark. The traditional Church has portrayed the authors as the apostles Mark, Luke, Matthew, & John, but scholars know from critical textural research that there simply occurs no evidence that the gospel authors could have served as the apostles described in the Gospel stories. Yet even today, we hear priests and ministers describing these authors as the actual disciples of Christ. Many Bibles still continue to label the stories as “The Gospel according to St. Matthew,” “St. Mark,” “St. Luke,” St. John.” No apostle would have announced his own sainthood before the Church’s establishment of sainthood. See if one can find out from the texts who wrote them and try to find the author’s name or names. The average life span of humans in the first century came to around 30, and very few people lived to 70. If the apostles births occured at about the same time as the alleged Jesus, and wrote their gospels in their old age, that would put Mark at least 70 years old, and John at over 110. The gospel of Mark describes the first written Bible gospel. And although Mark appears deceptively after the Matthew gospel, the gospel of Mark got written at least a generation before Matthew. From its own words, we can deduce that the author of Mark had neither heard Jesus nor served as his personal follower. Whoever wrote the gospel, he simply accepted the mythology of Jesus without question and wrote a crude an ungrammatical account of the popular story at the time. Any careful reading of the three Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) will reveal that Mark served as the common element between Matthew and Luke and gave the main source for both of them. Of Mark’s 666* verses, some 600 appear in Matthew, some 300 in Luke. The author of Mark, stands at least at a third remove from Jesus and more likely at the fourth remove. Most Bibles show 678 verses for Mark, not 666, but many Biblical scholars think the last 12 verses came later from interpolation. The earliest manuscripts and other ancient sources do not have Mark 16: 9-20. Moreover the text style does not match and the transition between verse 8 and 9 appears awkward. Even some of today’s Bibles such as the NIV exclude the last 12 verses. The author of Matthew had obviously gotten his information from Mark’s gospel and used them for his own needs. He fashioned his narrative to appeal to Jewish tradition and Scripture. He improved the grammar of Mark’s Gospel, corrected what he felt theologically important, and heightened the miracles and magic. The author of Luke admits himself as an interpreter of earlier material and not an eyewitness (Luke 1:1-4). Many scholars think the author of Luke lived as a gentile, or at the very least, a hellenized Jew and even possibly a woman. He (or she) wrote at a time of tension in the Roman empire along with its fever of persecution. Many modern scholars think that the Gospel of Matthew and Luke got derived from the Mark gospel and a hypothetical source. John, the last appearing Bible Gospel, presents us with long theological discourses from Jesus and could not possibly have come as literal words from a historical Jesus. The Gospel of John disagrees with events described in Mark, Matthew, and Luke. Moreover the book got written in Greek near the end of the first century, and the book “carried within it a very obvious reference to the death of John Zebedee (John 21:23). Please understand that the stories themselves cannot serve as examples of eyewitness accounts since they came as products of the minds of the unknown authors, and not from the characters themselves. The Gospels describe narrative stories, written almost virtually in the third person. People who wish to portray themselves as eyewitnesses will write in the first person, not in the third person. Moreover, many of the passages attributed to Jesus could only have come from the invention of its authors. For example, many of the statements of Jesus claim to have come from him while allegedly alone. If so, who heard him? It becomes even more marked when the evangelists report about what Jesus thought. To whom did Jesus confide his thoughts? Clearly, the Gospels employ techniques that fictional writers use. In any case the Gospels can only serve, at best, as hearsay, and at worst, as fictional, mythological, or falsified stories. Even in antiquity people like Origen and Eusebius raised doubts about the authenticity of other books in the New Testament such as Hebrews, James, John 2 & 3, Peter 2, Jude, and Revelation. Martin Luther rejected the Epistle of James calling it worthless and an “epistle of straw” and questioned Jude, Hebrews and the Apocalypse in Revelation. Nevertheless, all New Testament writings came well after the alleged death of Jesus from unknown authors Paul’s biblical letters (epistles) serve as the oldest surviving Christian texts, written probably around 60 C.E. Most scholars have little reason to doubt that Paul wrote some of them himself. However, there occurs not a single instance in all of Paul’s writings that he ever meets or sees an earthly Jesus, nor does he give any reference to Jesus’ life on earth. Therefore, all accounts about a Jesus could only have come from other believers or his imagination. Hearsay. Epistle of James mentions Jesus only once as an introduction to his belief. Nowhere does the epistle reference a historical Jesus and this alone eliminates it from an historical account. The epistles of John, the Gospel of John, and Revelation appear so different in style and content that they could hardly have the same author. Some suggest that these writings of John come from the work of a group of scholars in Asia Minor who followed a “John” or they came from the work of church fathers who aimed to further the interests of the Church. Or they could have simply come from people also named John which is a very common name. No one knows. Also note that nowhere in the body of the three epistles of “John” does it mention a John. In any case, the epistles of John say nothing about seeing an earthly Jesus. Not only do we not know who wrote these epistles, they can only serve as hearsay accounts. Many scholars question the authorship of Peter of the epistles. Even within the first epistle, it says in 5:12 that Silvanus wrote it. Most scholars consider the second epistle as unreliable or an outright forgery (for some examples, see the introduction to 2 Peter in the full edition of The New Jerusalem Bible, In short, no one has any way of determining whether the epistles of Peter come from fraud, an unknown author also named Peter (a common name) or from someone trying to further the aims of the Church. Of the remaining books and letters in the Bible, there occurs no other stretched claims or eyewitness accounts for a historical Jesus and needs no mention of them here for this deliberation. As for the existence of original New Testament documents, none exist. No book of the New Testament survives in the original autograph copy. What we have then come from copies, and copies of copies, of questionalbe originals (if the stories came piecemeal over time, as it appears it has, then there may never have existed an original). The earliest copies we have got written more than a century later than the autographs, and these exist on fragments of papyrus. [Pritchard; Graham] According to Hugh Schonfield, “It would be impossible to find any manuscript of the New Testament older than the late third century, and we actually have copies from the fourth and fifth. The editing and formation of the Bible came from members of the early Christian Church. Since the fathers of the Church possessed the texts and determined what would appear in the Bible, there occurred plenty of opportunity and motive to change, modify, or create texts that might bolster the position of the Church or the members of the Church themselves. Take, for example, Eusebius who served as an ecclesiastical church historian and bishop. He had great influence in the early Church and he openly advocated the use of fraud and deception in furthering the interests of the Church. The first mention of Jesus by Josephus came from Eusebius (none of the earlier church fathers mention Josephus’ Jesus). It comes to no surprise why many scholars think that Eusebius interpolated his writings. In his Ecclesiastical History, he writes, “We shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity.” (Vol. 8, chapter 2). In his Praeparatio Evangelica, he includes a chapter titled, “How it may be Lawful and Fitting to use Falsehood as a Medicine, and for the Benefit of those who Want to be Deceived” . The Church had such power over people, that to question the Church could result in death. Regardless of what the Church claimed, people had to take it as “truth.” St. Ignatius Loyola of the 16th century even wrote: “We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides.” The orthodox Church also fought against competing Christian cults. Irenaeus, who determined the inclusion of the four (now canonical) gospels, wrote his infamous book, “Against the Heresies.” According to Romer, “Irenaeus’ great book not only became the yardstick of major heresies and their refutations, the starting-point of later inquisitions, but simply by saying what Christianity was not it also, in a curious inverted way, became a definition of the orthodox faith.” [Romer] The early Church burned many heretics, along with their sacred texts. If a Jesus did exist, perhaps eyewitness writings got burnt along with them because of their heretical nature. We will never know. With such intransigence from the Church and the admitting to lying for its cause, the burning of heretical texts, Bible errors and alterations, how could any honest scholar take any book from the New Testament as absolute, much less using extraneous texts that support a Church’s intolerant and biased position, as reliable evidence?

by: The Hidden facts

Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:35:09 +0000

Religion was the way to power and glory from time immemorial. So when a series of religious philosophies hit the world from India, esp. after the arrival of Buddhism, intellectuals in other nations about 2500 years back started writing their own religious manuals. Yet it was not easy. So they sought the help of Indians to create their own religious texts. The christian religious heads become very powerful over centuries. They had human beings as slaves in the name of God. Men and Women were donated to the church by the parents and formed the slave labour force of the church which followed various economic goals with this slave labour. Women have become the wives of Jesus or in our language, became the christian Devadasis. It is no wonder that using this religion as cover, christians have killed about half billion humans on this planet with impunity and even surpassed Islam, which killed much less millions of humans in the name of Islam. Organized religions are like an industry with huge stakes in the economic well being of those who are involved in it. So how to start a religion? Copy old customs and create a fake prophet and claim superhuman abilities. The prophet will act as an agent between God and the humans and condone criminalities. The prophets should have the ability to offer a great abode for the soul in heaven after death and fortunately for these religious con artists, no one can verify the existence of soul or the heaven. .
The Bible was written by the Hindu and Pagan intellectuals for the working class. The Hindu Matsya Purana (Fish Chronicle) describes some of the people who, after a severe flood, left India for other parts of the world. Three sons were born to Satyavarman, who is the sovereign of the whole earth. The eldest son was Shem; then Sham; and thirdly, Jyapeti. They were all men of good morals, excellent in virtue and virtuous deeds, skilled in the use of weapons to strike with, or to be thrown; brave men, eager for victory in battle. But Satyavarman, being continually delighted with devout meditation, and seeing his sons fit for dominion, laid upon them the burdens of government. Whilst he remained honoring and satisfying the gods, and priests, and king, one day, by the act of destiny, the king, having drunk mead became senseless and lay asleep naked. Then, he was seen by Sham, and he called his two brothers to whom he said, “What now has befallen? In what state is this our sire?” With the help of brothers he covered the nakedness with clothes, and called to his senses again and again. Having recovered his intellect, and perfectly knowing what had passed, he cursed Sham, saying, “Thou shalt be the servant of servants.” And since thou wast a laugher in their presence, from laughter thou shalt acquire a name. Then he gave Sham the wide domain on the south of the snowy mountains. And to Jyapeti he gave all on the north of the snowy mountains; but he, by the power of religious contemplation, attained supreme bliss.
If one has read the Jewish or Christian bible, one can guess who Satyavarman, Shem, Sham, and Jyapeti were. Satyavarman and his sons are Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japhet. The Old Testament tells us that Satyavarman (Noah) got drunk by imbibing wine made from his vines in what is now Armenia, near Mt. Ararat. In Sanskrit, Satya-Varman means “Protector of Truth; Protector of the Righteous.” Varman often occurs at the end of the names of Kshatriyas (Hereditary Hindu Leadership Caste). Shem/Sem means “An Assembly.” According to White racists(s), Ham was turned black as punishment for lacking in respect for his father. The Christian Fundamentalists insist that Sham fathered the Africans. It was this superstition that helped perpetuate the institution of slavery in pre-Civil war, South USA. Jyapeti became the “God of the Sun” or the Christian, Jewish, Assyrian, Greek and Roman Jupiter and Jahve or Jehovah. For the Hindus, he is Dyaus Pitar, mankind’s first known manifestation of God Shiva.
Satyavarman told Sham that he would acquire a name from laughter. Two of the two tribes descended from Sham were the Ha-Ha and Ho-Ho. They later migrated to other parts of the world. Ha-Ha (am)/Ham, meaning “The Ha people,” were among the founders of Egypt. Other descendants of Sham, the Hohokam, settled in the American Southwest. Kam derives from the Sanskrit Gana, meaning “Tribe.” Hohokam = “The Ho-Ho Tribe.” Notice that both groups were desert people. Another tribe that first settled in the American Southwest were the Anazazi, known in ancient India as Anaza-zi (The Undestroyed and Living God Shiva).
The Jewish Noah’s Ark legend appears to be a mixture of three Hindu flood myths: Satyavarman, Vaivasvata, and Nahusha. The Mahabharata states: “The progeny of Adamis and Hevas (Adam and Eve) soon became so wicked that they were no longer able to coexist peacefully. Brahma therefore decided to punish his creatures “Vishnu” [right] ordered Vaivasvata to build a ship for himself and his family. When the ship was ready, and Vaivasvata and his family were inside with the seeds of every plant and a pair of every species of animal, the big rains began and the rivers began to overflow.”
Not only are the names of the main players in the Noah story the same as the family of Satyavarman, but, like the Vaivasvata part that the Old Testament authors plagiarized from the Mahabharata, the rains fell for forty days and forty nights.
According to the Vaivasvata story, Shem’s name is Manu; Ham or Sham is Nabhanedistha; Japhet is Yayati or Dyaus-Pitar (Jupiter or the Hebrew Jehovah).
The third “Noah” was a deity named Dyaus-Nahusha. Westerners call him Dionysius or Bacchus. Bacchus derives from the Sanskrit Bagha, meaning “God the Androgynous.” When a great flood destroyed the world, Nahusha left India in order to restore civilization to mankind. He also left India for another reason.
One of the places where he stopped was a small island city state called Sancha Dwipa (Sancha Island), where the citizens built their homes out of seashells.

by: The Hidden facts

Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:30:59 +0000

Priyapettavare,

Noottandukalkku mumbu Sanyasivaryan maar telescope vazhi nokki alla eee prapanchathil 9 grahangal undennu paranjathu..Jeevitha sastram,Janthu Sastram,Aanava sastram tudangiya granthangal rachichathum enthenkilum munvidhiyode alla.Evidences that Christianity copied Hindu sculptures is as below….Noha and his boat is copied from Matsyapuranam of Hindus.
As per Hindu Puranas, Shri Karnan is said to have been the son of a virgin mother, Kunti.
• The newly created Jesus Christ is said to have been the son of a virgin mother, Mary.

• Shri Karnan is said to have been the son of God (in the form of Suryadev).
• Jesus Christ is said to have been the son of God (”the Father”).

• Shri Karnan’s “father”, the charioteer of King Dhritarashtra, was actually no more than his adopted father.
• Jesus’s “father”, Mary’s husband, the carpenter, (Note: Christianity was made for the working class so a carpenter was selected as the adopted father) was actually no more than his adopted father.

• Little, if anything, is known of Shri Karan’s life between his childhood and his adulthood.
• Little, if anything, is known of Jesus’s life between his childhood and his adulthood.

Also from Hindu Puranas the following details were adopted for the Jesus Christ myth.
• Shri Krishna’s birth and subsequent rule as “King” (taking over from the existing King, Kamsa) is said to have been foretold by a divine announcement.
• Jesus Christ’s birth and subsequent rule as “King” (taking over from the existing King, Herod) is said to have been foretold by a divine announcement.

• Kamsa found out and thus tried to protect himself by killing lots of babies.
• Herod found out and thus tried to protect himself by killing lots of babies.

• Kamsa didn’t manage to get the right baby because Krishna was taken away by the river to Dwarka.
• Herod didn’t manage to get the right baby because Jesus was taken away by the sea to Nazareth.

• A great deal of confusion surrounds Krishna’s life between his childhood and his adulthood.
• A great deal of confusion surrounds Jesus’s life between his childhood and his adulthood.

• Shri Krishna’s “father” (the person who brought him up) was actually his adopted father.
• Jesus’s father (the person who brought him up) was actually his adopted father.

by: ajitkumar

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:29:27 +0000

ororutharudeyum samskaram ee kamants vayichal ariyan kazhiyum

by: Sandeep

Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:04:41 +0000

“ഡോ. എൻ. ഗോപാലകൃഷ്ണൻ, എം. ആർ. രാജേഷ് തുടങ്ങിയവർ എഴുതിയും പറഞ്ഞും കൂട്ടുന്ന അസംബന്ധങ്ങളെ സംസ്കൃതമറിയാത്ത സാധാരണജനങ്ങൾ വെള്ളം തൊടാതെ വിഴുങ്ങുന്നതാണു് ഏറ്റവും സങ്കടകരം”

Not really . Read these papers before
doing such self-flagellations.
Balasubramaniam, R. et al. Analysis of terracotta scale of Harappan civilization from Kalibangan. Curr. Sci. 95, 588-589 (2008)
Balasubramaniam, R. New insights on the modular planning of the Taj Mahal. Curr. Sci. 97, 42-49 (2009)

Balasubramaniam, R. On the mathematical significance of the dimensions of the Delhi Iron Pillar. Curr. Sci. 95,766-770 (2008)

by: salu

Mon, 09 May 2011 07:03:26 +0000

very brilliant post!
congrats for your good efforts in disclosing the truths which ’sbeen muddled up in intricate webs…
It is quite easily common mob falls in pseudo seers’ chants….
i wish and hope we could use our brain properly ..

rgrds
salu

by: Ravishanker C N

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:17:48 +0000

mashe.. gambheeram.. please i want a book published by you, suraj and any others who are doing similar work…. onninumalla.. kore ennangale othukkan undu….

ithu takarthu ‘ഏതെങ്കിലും മനുഷ്യനു 956 മീറ്റർ പൊക്കമുണ്ടാവുമോ എന്നു് ഏതെങ്കിലും വിവരദോഷികൾ ചോദിച്ചാലും സാരമില്ല. മഹാഭാരതത്തിലെ ഘടോൽക്കചന്റെ വർണ്ണന ഒന്നു സംസ്കൃതത്തിൽ ക്വോട്ടു ചെയ്തിട്ടു് ആ കാലത്തെ മനുഷ്യർക്കു് അത്രയും വലിപ്പമുണ്ടു് എന്നു സമർത്ഥിക്കാവുന്നതേ ഉള്ളൂ. ഗുഡ് ലക്ക്! ‘

athupole avasanathe pattikayum… salute you man!

by: കൈപ്പ്പള്ളി

Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:20:40 +0000

Veenu

“All calculations are done as per some assumptions only.”
A theory is based on a hypotheses, in your layman term “asumption”. But these assumptions should be validated by thorough and proof based on scientific methodology that suite its specific field.

A scientific theory is perfect till proven otherwise. It can be better described as a path to perfection. Scientist work towards the goal of perfection on strong foundations built layer upon layer of proven theories and axioms.

Everything we see around us was the result of science.
Faith is absolute and does not vary, that is exactly the problem with assumptions based on faith.

A scientist is someone who is willing to change his understanding based on new findings. The path to scientific understanding is through experimentation, observation and inference. Hence science is truly dynamic. No theories are written in stone. If that was the case then there would be no more Research & Development divisions in universities.

Vedic astronomers and mathematicians were no doubt scientist. The common term to denote vedic science and vedic religious text is still called “Shastra” But they lived at a time when faith and science was indistinguishable from each other. Thier yearning to understand their world around them was naturally coloured by their religious roots.

They ceased to be scientists when religious fanatics hijacked their their works as religious Science.

The problem with the proponents of the so-called vedic-science is that they wish to remain in BC 2000 and hold those as the end all of scientific endeveour.

If those ancient mathematicians and astronomers were alive today they would gladly embrace modern science and be willing to revise their understanding based on new scientific revelations. They would ridicule these morons who still hang on to 3000 year old findings.

by: veenu

Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:50:25 +0000

I done agree with what you are writting. How you can say modern science is perfect. All calculations are done as per some asumptions only. By day to day knowledge or experiments or some valid conclusions the result or statement varries. So dont blame any one… Not all the people are fool or some are inteligent.